All the usual suspects—the Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers and retailers—are backing a last ditch effort in the Senate to derail new rules by the NLRB to speed up the process for workers to decide on union representation. The rules are scheduled to go into effect on April 30, 2012.
Forty-five senators have signed on to a resolution (S.J. 36) that would, if approved by a simple Senate majority, nullify the new rules, enabling employers to continue endless stalls with appeals and legal loopholes to frustrate union representation.
Union members are urged to contact their senators and urge them to vote “no” on S.J. Res. 36.
Vote No on CRA Resolution Overturning NLRB Election Rule
- When workers want to vote on whether to form a union under current National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) procedures, they face an outdated, inefficient government process that creates barriers and allows endless delay. Marathon litigation, frivolous appeals, and duplicative procedures lead to endless delays, leaving workers with no way to enforce their right to vote.
- For example, current rules allow an employer to delay an election by manufacturing an issue, such as the eligibility of a single worker to participate in an election, and then demand a hearing – even if the outcome would not affect the election results. After the hearing, appeals can be filed with the full Board in Washington. All of this legal maneuvering – no matter how frivolous and wasteful – can put off an election for months and even years.
- In December, 2011, the NLRB issued a rule that makes sensible, modest changes to the current election system so that workers who want to vote on whether to have a union can actually have a vote.
- The NLRB’s final election rule is aimed at avoiding litigation over frivolous issues, eliminating needlessly duplicative appeal procedures, and minimizing current opportunities to manipulate the process and stall the election.
- Under the new rule, workers would be free to vote yes or no on whether to form a union – the new rule neither encourages unionization nor discourages it and does not change how employers and unions communicate with workers. It merely removes some of the barriers workers now face when they want a simple up-or-down vote.
- The NLRB’s rule-making process that led to the adoption of this rule was comprehensive, thorough, inclusive, and transparent. Thousands of comments were received and considered and the NLRB held a public hearing for additional input. The new rule was approved in full compliance with the Administrative Procedures Act and other applicable statutes.
- Passage of the Resolution submitted under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) would prevent the NLRB’s new election procedures from being implemented and stop important changes that will benefit workers, their communities and our economy.
Tell Your Senator to Vote Against SJ RES 36
Below is the letter that was sent from William Samuel, Director of the AFL-CIO Government Affairs Department
Dear Senator :
On behalf of the AFL-CIO, I urge you to vote against S.J. RES 36, a Resolution aimed at blocking a rule to update and modernize the procedures used by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to supervise elections for workers who want to vote on whether to form a union.
Workers who want to vote on whether to form a union deserve the right to vote without lengthy, drawn-out litigation and endless, unnecessary delays. Yet under current rules workers can be forced to wait months and even years before they are able to exercise their right to vote and then bargain for an enforceable contract with good wages and benefits. The NLRB’s new rule eliminates many of the barriers workers now face by reducing current delays, eliminating frivolous and duplicative litigation, and ensuring that workers have a fair vote in a reasonable period of time.
The NLRB’s final election rules ensures uniformity, consistency, and fairness. It is an important step towards fixing a severely broken system. The new NLRB rule implements modest, commonsense solutions to address the fundamentally flawed and time-consuming procedures of the current system. It is aimed at avoiding litigation over frivolous issues, eliminating needlessly duplicative appeal procedures, and minimizing current opportunities to manipulate the process and stall the election. Workers should not be subjected to interminable delays for their rights to be honored.
The new rule does not encourage or discourage unionization. It does not establish any timelines or deadlines for conducting NLRB-supervised elections or mandate that elections be conducted in any specific number of days; as under the current procedures, the timing of elections will vary from case to case. The new rule does not in any way change the employer’s ability to communicate with workers during the election period or conduct mandatory meetings with workers. It applies equally to elections to form a union and to decertify an existing union.
The National Labor Relations Act and Supreme Court precedent grant the Board specific, explicit authority to engage in rule-making for the purpose of establishing rules governing representation case proceedings, like those contained in the new election rule. The NLRB’s rulemaking process that led to the adoption of this rule was comprehensive, through, inclusive, and transparent. Thousands of comments were received and considered and the NLRB held a public hearing for additional input. The new rule was approved in full compliance with the Administrative Procedures Act and other applicable statutes. It does not overturn any Board precedent; it does not reverse any prior Board decisions.
The new NLRB rule makes modest, sensible changes to bring balance to the election process. A vote against the Resolution will ensure that the rights of working people economic security are protected.
William Samuel, Director
Government Affairs Department, AFL-CIO
In a March 30, 2012 letter addressed to President Obama officers from AFL-CIO and its affiliated unions urged the Obama Administration to confrer on TSO full collective bargaining rights with a binding grievance and arbitration procedure similar to the rights of other federal employees.
Transportation Security Officers (TSO) overwhelmingly voted to join the American Federation of Government Employees, AFGE in June 2011.
TSO has been in bargaining with the Transportation Security Administration for close to a year since the election, the parties have still not reached an agreement on a contract.
The letter was signed by 37 eleted officers of affiliated unions and department heads of the AFL-CIO.